Big Pharma and the FDA vs. Nutritional Supplements

garynorth.com / W. D. Robins / March 25, 2017

“While the idea of admitting that a bureaucracy is necessary, I must also admit that marketers are liars and if left unregulated will rival politicians in their dishonesty when making product claims. Both admissions shake my libertarian sensibilities to the core.”

First, a free market eventually corrects for the condition of “marketers are liars,” unlike with politicians. Furthermore, not ALL marketers are liars.

Second, what makes you think the FDA, or any government bureaucracy for that matter, doesn’t lie? If one thinks we need an FDA, then one should think that we also need an EPA, FED, NLRB, EEOC, and on, and on, and on … further violating your libertarian sensibilities.

The head administrator of the FDA is pretty much a revolving door with Big Pharma:

http://jacksdailydose.com/2017/03/22/fdas-new-boss-is-a-big-pharma-hackWhy is government regulation always the knee jerk reaction to every ill that affects society? Can you creatively think of some other solutions that don’t violate the Constitution of the United States? Keep reading, and maybe some other ideas will present themselves.

More people die every year from legalized drugs than from taking supplements, not to mention the drugs the FDA eventually gets around to recalling, after they’ve already done

Read more ... source: The Bitcoin Channel

News from Darknet

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Powered by Bitcoin Central